top of page

‘Don’t Do Petty Things’: Tej Pratap Yadav Denies Claims of Removing Amenities From Patna Bungalow

Patna:Janshakti Janata Dal (JJD) chief Tej Pratap Yadav has strongly rejected allegations made by Bihar minister Lakhendra Paswan that several amenities were missing from the government bungalow previously occupied by him in Patna. Calling the claims “completely baseless”, Yadav asserted that all items used during his stay were purchased using his personal funds.

The controversy centres around the government residence at 26 M, Strand Road, Patna, which Tej Pratap Yadav had occupied during his tenure as an MLA. Responding to the allegations, Yadav categorically denied removing any government property from the bungalow.

Tej Pratap Yadav news

‘Bought Everything With My Own Money’

Speaking to reporters, Tej Pratap said the bungalow was allotted to him without basic amenities when he took possession.

“We don’t do such petty things. When I was allotted the bungalow as an MLA, there was nothing inside. I brought air conditioners, fans, bulbs and other facilities at my own expense,” he said, adding that there was no question of taking away government property.


Targets Minister Over Allegations

Taking a sharp dig at Bihar minister Lakhendra Paswan, Tej Pratap accused him of making false and misleading statements for political mileage.

“The minister’s intelligence has failed. Such allegations are being made only to gain media attention,” Yadav said, asserting that the issue was being unnecessarily politicised.


Political Row Intensifies

The allegations and counter-allegations have triggered a fresh political row in Bihar, with opposition leaders accusing the ruling dispensation of indulging in baseless controversies. Supporters of Tej Pratap Yadav have also defended him, insisting that the claims lack evidence.


No Official Inquiry Announced Yet

As of now, there has been no official confirmation of an inquiry into the matter. However, the issue continues to draw political reactions amid heightened tensions in the state’s political landscape.

Comments


bottom of page