📰 High Court Pulls Up MSRTC Over Driver’s Dismissal Based on Media Reports, Orders Reinstatement

In a significant ruling reinforcing principles of natural justice, the Bombay High Court has ruled against the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation for dismissing a driver solely on the basis of media reports, terming the action arbitrary and in violation of established service rules.

The case revolved around an MSRTC driver who was terminated after certain allegations surfaced in media coverage. The corporation acted on these reports without conducting a proper departmental inquiry or giving the employee an adequate opportunity to defend himself. Challenging the dismissal, the driver approached the High Court, arguing that the action was unjust and bypassed due process.

After examining the matter, the court observed that reliance on unverified media reports cannot form the sole basis for punitive action against an employee. It stressed that any disciplinary proceedings must follow due procedure, including a fair inquiry, presentation of evidence, and an opportunity for the accused to be heard.

The court held that MSRTC’s decision clearly violated service regulations and principles of fairness. It further noted that such actions undermine employee rights and set a dangerous precedent if left unchecked.

In its order, the High Court directed the corporation to reinstate the driver to his position. Additionally, it instructed MSRTC to pay 50% of the back wages for the period during which the employee remained out of service, acknowledging the financial hardship caused by the wrongful termination.

The judgment is being seen as a strong reminder to government bodies and public sector undertakings to adhere strictly to due process before taking disciplinary action. Legal experts say the ruling could have wider implications, ensuring that employees are protected from arbitrary decisions based on unverified or sensational media reports.

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation has not yet publicly responded to the verdict, but the case is expected to influence how similar disciplinary matters are handled in the future.