Priyanka Chaturvedi Calls Supreme Court Order on NCERT Textbook ‘Judicial Overreach’

Priyanka Chaturvedi, Member of Parliament from the Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray), has criticised a recent directive issued by the Supreme Court of India regarding content in a school textbook published by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). She described the move as “judicial overreach” and called for maintaining a clear balance between the three pillars of democracy.

Reacting to the court’s observations, Chaturvedi said that while institutions must function responsibly, it is equally important to respect the boundaries between the legislature, executive and judiciary. She argued that the judiciary stepping into matters related to academic content could raise questions about institutional balance and democratic functioning.

The controversy arose after the Supreme Court reportedly took note of references related to corruption in the judiciary mentioned in an NCERT political science textbook. The court expressed concern over the wording used in the book and sought explanations from authorities regarding how such references were included in educational material meant for students.

Chaturvedi questioned why there was such sensitivity over the mention of corruption in discussions about institutions, pointing out that transparency and accountability are essential for all branches of governance. She stated that democratic systems grow stronger when institutions are open to scrutiny and criticism rather than restricting such discussions.

The Rajya Sabha MP also emphasised the importance of maintaining parity among the legislature, executive and judiciary, adding that none of the branches should appear to dominate the others. According to her, academic discussions about governance structures, including criticism, are part of democratic education and should be addressed through dialogue rather than intervention.

The issue has sparked wider political debate, with several leaders and legal experts expressing differing opinions. Some have supported the Supreme Court’s concern, saying textbooks must be carefully written to avoid misleading impressions among students. Others argue that discussions about institutional accountability are a legitimate part of political science education.

The NCERT textbook in question forms part of the curriculum used in schools affiliated with the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). Education experts say the controversy could lead to a review of how sensitive topics related to governance and public institutions are presented in school materials.

As the debate continues, observers say the episode has once again highlighted the delicate balance between judicial authority, academic freedom, and democratic accountability in India’s governance framework.